[nas] License clarification

Petr Pisar ppisar at redhat.com
Wed Oct 9 00:59:15 MDT 2013

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:22:01PM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
> I think so.  The original NAS authors at NCD were quite sure they
> wanted MIT licensing, like X11.
> I've pushed these changes to the new git repo.
Thank you very much.

Just a nitpick: doc/README still lists title.ps.

-- Petr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://radscan.com/pipermail/nas/attachments/20131009/bc37ecc7/attachment.pgp>

More information about the nas mailing list