[nas] Re: nas and pulseaudio?
jon at radscan.com
Mon Nov 12 21:09:01 MST 2007
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Paul Fox wrote:
> jon wrote:
> > protocol under PA would however. What would be the point of the
> > auplay client under PA for example, other than a test of PA's NAS
> > protocol handling? Those who want something light and 'simple'
> > (without the dependancies PA needs) might still prefer to run plain
> > old nasd.
> what you might be forgetting is that in any given nas installation,
> there are probably more client pieces than server pieces. i have
> just three nasd servers running in the house, but many many
> instances of auplay, madplay_nas, aumix, etc, scattered
> throughout various scripts on various systems. i'm not looking
> forward to finding and replacing all those aufoo programs if i were
> to want to switch to PA for some reason.
Me?? I think I was agreeing with you...?
> p.s. believe it or not, we even use auedit -- my wife finds the
> "replay segment between markers" feature to be incredibly useful
> for practicing her chorus part, using demo music that's handed
> out for that purpose.
That's just sick. (The young ones tell me that sick = cool these
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel! | mailto:jon at radscan.com
Brocolli, hostage. -Unknown | #include <std/disclaimer.h>
More information about the Nas