[nas] patch: missing return value

[Erik Auerswald]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:19:57AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> i wrote:
>  > could i ask a favor?  would it be possible to rationalize the
>  > indentation of the code?  i don't really care what the
>  > indentation should be, nor do i care whether it's done with
>  > spaces or tabs or both, but it needs to be consistent.  take a
>  > look at auvoxware.c:closeDevice(), for instance.  it looks like
>  > most of the code is inside of an "if (NasConfig.DoDebug)", but
>  > of course, it's not....
> 
> by the way, i'm willing to do this work (for the server, at
> least), if we can agree on a style.  i can run the code through
> indent, and manually fix what it botches...  but it needs to be
> done when no one else is doing a lot of development (i.e., probably
> not right now) in order to prevent a lot of conflicts.

Some kind of indentation style to follow would be nice... I don't really
care what style is used, I just prefer spaces only (no tabs).

Erik