[nas] 2 possible patches for the 1.9.1 version
Raymond Toy (RT/EUS)
raymond.toy at ericsson.com
Fri Nov 2 14:22:45 MDT 2007
Frank Büttner wrote:
> Jon Trulson schrieb:
>> This one I am not sure about either... It does sound like a good
>> idea, but:
>> - Is this the generally accepted practice for linux now? Should we
>> '#if defined(linux)' it?
>> - looking briefly, it looks like at least Solaris 10 also does the
>> /var/run thing... Are there any Solaris people that think this
>> should be done on that platform by default too?
>> - *BSD's? What are they doing these days?
>> I don't want to add this particular patch as-is (at least for 1.9.1)
>> since it will affect all OS's. I think it would be ok with an 'if
>> defined(linux)' though.
> Yes, it shut be an solution for all OS's.
> I thing the file can put at /var/run on all Unix like OS's.
> Or have someone other voice?
Solaris 8 has /var/run. Good. But it's not user writable, and I do my
own local install with everything running as me, not root, so this won't
work for me.
Of course, I'm still using nas 1.7 (or earlier?) because it just works. :-)
More information about the Nas