Fwd: Re: [nas] Re: You are apparently unaware that you (with NAS) are violating the GPL?

[Jon Trulson]

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:

> On Friday 08 June 2007 19:45:51 Jon Trulson wrote:
>>> Your "un-obnoxiously licensed software" is *GPLed* software if you
>>> distribute it / deliver it via Cygwin.
>
> Although this character obviously lacking better things to do in life as well
> as being good entertainment to play with, the issue is kind of real (even if
> blown out or propotions).
>
> I might lack insight into licensing issues, but wouldn't the freedom nas'
> license permit something as simple as dual license nas under GPL license be
> enough to not violate the GPL license?
>

   Actualy, only the source code needs to be available in order to
   satisfy GPL.  As you all know, the source code is available. :)


-- 
Jon Trulson
mailto:jon at radscan.com 
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
"No Kill I" -Horta