[nas] Re: You are apparently unaware that you (with NAS) are violating the GPL?
Jon Trulson
jon at radscan.com
Fri Jun 8 12:52:13 MDT 2007
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Jon Trulson <jon at radscan.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Soren A wrote:
>>
>> > WRT http://www.radscan.com/nas/nas-README.txt
>> >
>> > Violates the GPL license that applies when NAS is built with
>> > (distributed as) a Cygwin-linked binary.
>> >
>>
>> Wow, nice to meet you too! You meet so many cool people on the
>> internet.
>
> <snip>
>
> Jon, where did this come from? Just email you received? I wouldn't
> even bother replying to something like this: if they cannot write
> courteously it's just more spam and it already occu[ies 70% of
> everything.
>
Just an email sent to me. Ordinarily I would have just pressed 'D',
but the name sounded familiar, so I googled him. Seems he's one of
the cygwin developers.
I was just really surprised at his attitude :) I always viewed the
GPL as more of a religious license than anything else. I do not
think software can be more 'free' than under a BSD/MIT type
license. But perhaps that's just me.
Maybe Nicolas cares, since he provides a precompiled cygwin version
of NAS - hence the CC. Personally Nicolas, I would just ignore it.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:jon at radscan.com
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
"No Kill I" -Horta
More information about the Nas
mailing list