[nas] patch: missing return value

[Paul Fox]

jon wrote:
 > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Paul Fox wrote:
 > > if i put together a patch that turns the server into roughly K&R
 > > style, with 4 column indents, no tabs, would that work for
 > > everyone?
 > >
 > 
 >          I believe I could cope. :)
 > 

okay then.

i just experimented with astyle, bcpp, and indent.  since indent
was the only one to correctly indent, and therefore spot the bug,
at line 249 of os/WaitFor.c, i'll be using indent.  (the block of
code in that hpux ifdef should have braces around it.)

indent also complains about the foo=-1 ambiguity, which i like.

so i'm going to try using:
    indent -kr --no-tabs \
	--indent-level4 \
	--procnames-start-lines \
	--declaration-indentation4 \
	--continuation-indentation8

and see what happens.

i'm going to refrain from making any code changes at the same
time, so that this patch can be "purely" indentation changes.

i'll make a note any obvious bugs, or ugliness that requires
rearranging code, so that there can be a followon patch or two.

paul
=---------------------
 paul fox, pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 70.5 degrees)