--- Begin Message ---
Spam detection software, running on the system "m5.radscan.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
sysadmin@xxxxxxxxxxx for details.
Content preview: jon wrote: > > I was testing using http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45or5ZVW9Jw
> > Occasionally while switching streams, I'd get: > > Audio Error of failed
request: BadImplementation (server does not implement > operation) > Major
opcode of failed request: 0 () > Serial number of failed request: 11371 >
Current serial number in output stream: 1205 > > If I terminated the tab
(X), usually I would get a bunch of these > errors and the browser would hang
(until I killed nasd, in which > case the browser crashes). > > Before terminating
nasd, it would be running in a loop as if the > flow was still active, even
no data was being sent of course. > > Did you see this? [...]
Content analysis details: (6.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
4.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: youtube.com]
5.0 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: youtube.com]
--- Begin Message ---
jon wrote:
>
> I was testing using http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45or5ZVW9Jw
>
> Occasionally while switching streams, I'd get:
>
> Audio Error of failed request: BadImplementation (server does not implement
> operation)
> Major opcode of failed request: 0 ()
> Serial number of failed request: 11371
> Current serial number in output stream: 1205
>
> If I terminated the tab (X), usually I would get a bunch of these
> errors and the browser would hang (until I killed nasd, in which
> case the browser crashes).
>
> Before terminating nasd, it would be running in a loop as if the
> flow was still active, even no data was being sent of course.
>
> Did you see this?
in fact, i did, just after sending the patch to the list.
i'm not quite sure what to make of it -- the API to the flashsupport
library is exceedingly simple. oh -- perhaps the new flash stream causes
a new nas stream, in which case it's likely the old and new are getting
mixed up.
is there debug tracing that can be enabled in the server, to track
connections, and such?
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (arlington, ma, where it's 53.2 degrees)
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---